Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Dr. Strangelove, All About Its Cinematography


I'll start by saying GENIUS. This movie combines tragedy,action and even a little comedy. Watching Seller's work was an actual treat. I loved that the three characters were amazing in totally different ways. Captain Mandrake, a peaceful military man who is trying to save the day, President Muffley, a naive-non military man who is trying to do the best he can to stop the attacks, finally and most importantly Dr. Strangelove who is a crazy-bomb loving-strategy making-Adolf Hitler's fan. Unlike Lolita, Dr. Strangelove didn't need color, for me at least, it was executed brilliantly. The way cinematography techniques, such as lights and camera shots, were used made a great difference.

Instead of choosing a group of similar scene, I'll talk about a few scenes that are helped by lighting and camera angles. Starting with the scene where Captain Mandrake enters General Ripper's office with a hand radio. In this scene we can observe that Gnrl. Ripper has a full front light and since we are only seeing his back and Cpt. Mandrake standing right before him, the feeling of darkness and power is conveyed by the smoke and the light. When the camera shots the general from bellow with half his face in darkness this produces a sinister and important look. Also, when the base is under attack and the General starts setting up the machine-gun, and the captain is lying on the sofa and is illuminated with a bit of light from above it shows hoplesness and intimidation. Another scene where the light embraces the essence is The War Room. When the ambassador is talking about the Doomsday machine he is given a backlight which makes him a pop-out look that really accentuates the importance of his words. Later on, when Dr. Strangelove appears in total darkness while Captain "Buck" Turgidson is under light and praying it gives the look of good and evil. Later on when the attack is achieved, and Dr. Strangelove starts to expose his strategy, we perceive that he is the center of attention since he has a straight on light. While everybody else in the scene is forming a circle arround him and have absolutely no light.

Overall it was a great movie, with an amazing use of mise-en-scene and cinematography techniques. I'll say that the cinematography did all the difference in the world. To me it was better than Lolita.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Lolita (1962) Mise-en-scéne

Before exposing my analysis I think is important to point out that the movie is an eye opener. I would have never expect such a great work in black & white. Now starting with my analysis...

While watching the movie Lolita there were various scenes, in which the Mise-en-scène were very effective. One of the scenes, that was most influenced by this technique, from my point of view, was the “Summer Dance” scene. Starting with the characters, exquisite costumes and hairstyles so representatives of the times. In addition, the gyms decorations, the details such as the punch and the food, people laughing and toasting helps set the atmosphere and the feeling of being in an actual dance. Also, the band playing and all the kids dancing and having a great time, give the viewer the impression of being a part of the set. The adults can identify with the parents that have the responsibility of chaperoning. When in the other hand it gives the impression to the young viewers of attending the party. As well as eavesdropping in the adults conversations’ scenes. These are a great touch because they only make the movie seem more realistic. I believe that the director's wish to convey the look of happiness, familiarity and in a certain way of “perfection”, was flawless. Also, in the part where Charlotte Haze insists that Humbert goes back home with her instead of chaperoning in the Farlow's sleepover we can see how Humbert dislikes her and how desperate he is to be with Lolita. Which is what we will see through out the whole movie. Mrs.Haze persuing Humbert, while Humbert is after Lolita and so on the circle continues.

Alluding to the special effects that help us recognize mise-en-scène, like color, I'd say that the absence of color is a great downer for me, because I believe it would have made a great difference in the movie, in sense of giving a feeling of complete reality, is important to recognize the amazing execution of the actors as well as the production. Color was certainly not a obstacle for the director to make us a part of his project. Overall, I really loved the plot.